Please answer to this discussion post. At least two paragraphs with a minimum of two references, APA style and plagiarism.
-In 1997, two drugs, bromfenac and troglitazone, prompted the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to begin a cycle of yearly conferences to review issues of drug – induced liver injury (DILI). This was after the two drugs had shown serious fatal liver toxicity. Drug application reviewers were the first invitees to the conference in 1999. Academic consultants and pharmaceutical industry were later involved in 2001. As a result, FDA released a guidance entitled: “Guidance for Industry Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Premarketing Clinical Evaluation” (Senior 2014). This presentation was a rational approach was meant to assist in assessment of liver safety in clinical trials.
FDA identified DILI as a key area of focus in a joint effort to broaden the industry’s knowledge in liver toxicity. Since the guideline in 2009, DILI has been the main cause of most drug marketing withdrawals. FDA proposes standard non-clinical toxicity as the cornerstone for preventing hepatotoxicity in humans despite their predictive power being unsatisfactory (Senior 2014). As such, new tests with improved sensitivity and specificity are needed are required to predict hepatotoxicity in clinics.
The guidance describes observations needed to evaluate indicators of hepatotoxic potential. According to Senior (2014), these observations include detection, reaffirmation and examining of liver test abnormalities. The industry then does close evaluation excluding other possible caused of liver toxicity. Lastly, the FDA guidance requires the industry to those affected. This largely involves supportive care till return to baseline status or normality. FDA also makes specific recommendations in the presentation on why some people are more susceptible to DILI. It proposes the use and evaluation of Hy’s Law cases that are discovered through clinical examination.
Senior, J. R. (2014). Evolution of the Food and Drug Administration approach to liver safety assessment for new drugs: current status and challenges. Drug safety, 37(1), 9-17.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more