For the Week 4 Individual Reflection, you will use the frameworks of examining leadership and followership styles provided by Goleman (2000) and Bjugstad et al. (2006) to analyze two leaders with whom you are familiar.
Your Individual Reflection will be in two parts, with Part I submitted in Week 4 and Part II submitted in Week 5.
By Day 7
Submit Part I of the Individual Reflection by doing the following:
Select two leaders with whom you have interacted as a follower in your personal or professional life. The leaders you select could be current or former managers or executives in your professional life. However, you may also select current or former coaches, teachers, mentors, etc. from your personal life. Once you have selected the leaders, download and view the Writing Center APA Course Paper Template that you will use for the Week 4 and Week 5 Individual Reflection assignment via the link provided in this week’s Learning Resources. The template will provide you the format for the Individual Refection. Then complete the following:
Create an APA-style title page with a tentative title for your Individual Refection. Use the APA Course Paper Template as a guide to format the title page correctly.
Create a resource page. This page will contain the APA-style references of the two resources—Goleman (2000) and Bjugstad et al. (2006)—as well as at least one relevant resource that you or your colleague posted in the water cooler discussion. List the resources in alphabetical order.
Submit your Assignment.
To prepare for Part II for the Week 5 Individual Reflection:
Reflect on reasons for why you chose each leader.
Consider how the behaviors and actions of leaders you selected were consistent with contingency theory and the styles referred to in the Learning Resources. In other words, consider how the leadership styles of each leader aligned, or did not align, to the challenges they faced.
Reflect on whether the leaders were, or were not, effective.
Consider the reasons you, or others, chose to follow, or not to follow, these leaders and the risks you and others take on when making this choice.
You will need to support conclusions with references to the articles by Goleman (2000) and Bjugstad et al. (2006), as well as at least one resource you or a colleague posted in the water cooler discussion from this week. An exemplary paper will also integrate resources from previous weeks. Remember to review the appropriate rubric for this assignment so that you know how the Instructor will be grading your paper. 1 1/2 page in APA format
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more